Date : 10 - 01- 2011

It seems that the Federal Drug Administration does not seem to care if humans want to consume " cloned " meat and dairy products or not. It seems they have announced that they are going ahead with plans to begin placing these cloned food products on store shelves . This after a survey was done showing that :

A.) 65 % of Americans called the cloning of animals " morally wrong ."

B.) 63 % of Americans look " unfavorabally " at cloning in general .

C.) 57 % of Americans " oppose " research into the genetic modifacations of animals .

D.) 45 % of Americans " oppose " using cloning in food production .

E.) 30 % of Americans stated they would " never " eat anything from a cloned animal .

( Now I PERSONALLY find it very odd that the percentage of people who are against cloning in general is ( in the 60 + % range ) but the amount of people who stated that they " would never eat " something that was produced by a cloned animal is only half that figure in ( the 30 % range ). Now does that NOT seem odd to you ? I believe this last figure is most likely doctored . Because the FDA is " being pressured " by industry executives to issue a ruling in the favor of cloned animals being allowed in our food chain . In other words I feel that this last percentage is a made up one so people would be more likely to at least try the cloned food because the " stats " show that other must be willing to try it . Basically the sheep allowing themselves to be led on where to go and what to do by what " other sheep " are doing . ( Like your Mom warned you in the past : " If your friend had jumped off a cliff to show you he could get away with it without being bodily harmed WOULD YOU " ? ) Don't be dictated on where to go !

But if by some chance that percentage is accurate then I feel I am writing this article to help get those numbers back up to where they belong. ( It should be 100% of people not wanting these genetically altered foods ). The simple truth as I see it is that cloned food " IS NOT HEALTHY " for humans . ( Period ) !  How so you may ask ? I will be more than happy to share what I have found out with some simple study of my own .

This photo shows the procedure of the cloning process .

On the left side of this photo may be the key to why the PTB want us all eating genetically altered foods . The RNA strand is what some people believe ( including myself )  to be what our genetic structure looked like far back in the Garden of Eden in it's pristine or unaltered form . It is also believed that the DNA strand on the right is what the structure looked like after Lucifer genetically altered the first strand when he inseminated Eve which resulted in the birth of Cain her first son . Thus logic decrees that all humans born from the Cain lineage would also have the two strand structure verses the one strand structure or genetic map code . And over time with steady cross breeding DNA has become the dominant genetic structure map that we know as of today .

There is also a commonly held hypothesis in the scientific world which proposes that the earliest forms of life relied on RNA both to carry genetic information ( like DNA does today ) and to catalyze biochemical reactions like enzyme . According to this science hypothesis descendant's of these early life - forms gradually integrated DNA and proteins into their metabolism .  I stated earlier what I believe to be the real case on this matter . I believe there was no " gradual integration " of DNA into the genetic structure we have today . I believe the integration occurred with Cain's first born . This  line is also commonly termed by experts on the matter as " The Serpent Seedline ."

This photo is known as the Lemurian and Chaldean " Spiral Of Creation " symbol . Take notice of the coiled serpent ( a well known Satanic symbol ) and compare it with what appears to be a seed touching the serpent . This indicates that Satanists believe that the " seed of creation " came from the serpent ( Lucifer ) instead of by the Hand of God Himself . I am unsure at this present time what the symbol under the serpent represents .

HISTORY of  RNA  :  Nucleic acids were discovered in 1868 or 1869 ( depending on which source you believe ) by Johann Friedrich Meischer who termed or named the material " nuclein " since it was found in the nucleus . The role of RNA in protein synthesis has been suspected since 1939 , based on experiments carried out by Torbjorn Caspersson , Jean Brachet and Jack Schultz . The " messenger role " played by RNA in the synthesis of proteins in ribosome was elucidated by Hubert Chantrenne . The sequence of the " 77 " ( seventy - seven ) nucleotides of a yeast RNA was found by Robert W. Holley in 1964 . All single stranded RNA exhibit a " right handed " stacking pattern that is stabilized by base stacking .

( I know that most of you are not genetic terminology experts . So I will do my best to explain to you in laymen's terms what the RNA consists of and or is made up of after each " scientific description " paragraph . )

What is RNA ? Known as " Ribonucleic Acid " it is a polymer consisting of nucleotide monomers . RNA nucleotides contain ribose rings and Uracil " UNLIKE " DNA or by it's full name " Deoxyribonucleic Acids " which contains deoxyribose and thymine . RNA is transcribed or synthesized from DNA by enzymes called RNA polymerases .  RNA serves as the " template " for translation of genes into protiens , transferring amino acids to the ribosome to form proteins , and also " translating " the transcript into proteins .

( In Laymen's Terms ) : RNA pulls it's base genetic blueprint from the DNA strand . It is a polymer or " large organic molecule " formed by combining many smaller molecules or the " monomers " in a regular set stacked pattern . RNA holds the " translation template " or " Master Transcript Codes " for translation of genes into proteins that are to fulfill a certain job in the body . The DNA strand does not have this " Master Transcript Code Book " . And if the RNA does not have this " Master Transcript Code Book " to go by when converting genes into proteins then you can see right away the breakdown factor involving the effectivness of the RNA to perform it's required functions .

RNA is primarily made up of four different bases : Adenine , Guanine , Cystocine and Uracil . The first three are the same as those found in DNA , but in RNA Thymine is replaced by Uracil as the base complementary to adenine . Uracil is energetically easier to produce than Thymine , which may account for it's use by or in RNA . In DNA Uracil is easily / readily produced by chemical degradation of Cytosine . So DNA having Thymine as the normal base makes detection and repair of such " incipient mutations " more efficient . Thus Uracil is appropriate for RNA , where " quantity " is important but lifespan is not . Whereas Thymine is appropriate for DNA where maintaining sequence with " high fidelity " is more critical .

( In Laymen's Terms ) : RNA uses Uracil because it is easier to produce than Thymine . RNA must make up what it does not have in Thymine  " in mass quantities " of Uracil to keep up with the constant translation / conversion of genes into needed protiens .

Comparison With DNA

Unlike DNA , RNA is almost always a single stranded molecule and has a much shorter chain of nucleotides . RNA contains ribose , rather than the deoxyribose found in DNA where there is a hydroxyl attached to the pentrose ring in the 3' position whereas RNA has  two hydroxyl groups . These hydroxyl groups make RNA less stable than DNA because it is more prone to hydrolysis or a ( breakdown process ) . Several types of RNA ( tRNA & rRNA ) contain a great deal of secondary structure , which helps to promote stability .

( In Laymen's Terms ) :  RNA IS VERY FRAGILE TO BEGIN WITH  ! ! ! 

In Summary :

# 1. )  If the RNA can become unstable due to reasons unknown , then just as one would not turn a fan onto a house built of cards , you should not introduce a unknown or genetic change in the bases which the RNA takes from to perform it's required task . That being proteins found in meat , plants and dairy product's .

# 2. )  If you are consuming genetically altered foods , then know that you also run the risks of altering many base level genetics inside your body that depend on nutrients and proteins that they " KNOW " ( or recognize ) . In the same way that a motor can be affected if you ran the wrong oil through it so too is the same for your body . Except the only difference is that you can always replace a motor if it blows up . Your body and spirit on the other hand  , you cannot . What you eat now can also take a long time to come home to roost . The change may not be immediate . But it will almost most certainly happen to the point that you would be seriously damaged on the inside enough that it would seriously affect your health and longevity .

DO YOU THINK I AM MAKING THIS UP AS I GO ?

DO YOU FEEL THAT I REALLY HAVE A CASE ?

DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE A GUINEA PIG ?

LOOK WHAT A LEGITIMATE EXPERT SAYS ! ! !

(  MONSANTO WHISTLEBLOWER  ) :

" Genetically Engineered Crops May Cause Disease "

SPILLING THE BEANS : 2006

By Jeffrey Smith

August 28 , 2006

NewsWithViews.com

Monsanto was quite happy to recruit young Kirk Azevedo to sell
their genetically engineered cotton. Kirk had grown up on a California
farm and had worked in several jobs monitoring and testing pesticides
and herbicides. Kirk was bright, ambitious, handsome and idealistic , the
perfect candidate to project the company's "Save the world through
genetic engineering" image.

 

It was that image, in fact, that convinced Kirk to take the job in
1996. "When I was contacted by the headhunter from Monsanto, I
began to study the company, namely the work of their CEO, Robert
Shapiro." Kirk was thoroughly impressed with Shapiro's promise of a golden
future through genetically modified (GM) crops. "He described how
we would reduce the in-process waste from manufacturing, turn our
fields into factories and produce anything from lifesaving drugs to
insect-resistant plants. It was fascinating to me." Kirk thought,
"Here we go. I can do something to help the world and make it a
better place."

 

He left his job and accepted a position at Monsanto, rising quickly
to become the facilitator for GM cotton sales in California and
Arizona. He would often repeat Shapiro's vision to customers, researchers,
even fellow employees. After about three months, he visited Monsanto's
St. Louis headquarters for the first time for new employee training.
There too, he took the opportunity to let his colleagues know how
enthusiastic he was about Monsanto's technology that was going to
reduce waste, decrease poverty and help the world. Soon after the
meeting, however, his world was shaken.

 

"A vice president pulled me aside," recalled Kirk. "He told me
something like, `Wait a second. What Robert Shapiro says is one
thing. But what we do is something else. We are here to make money. He is
the front man who tells a story. We don't even understand what he is
saying. Kirk felt let down. "I went in there with the idea of helping and
healing and came out with `Oh, I guess it is just another
profit-oriented company.'" He returned to California, still holding
out hopes that the new technology could make a difference.

 

Possible Toxins In GM Plants

Kirk was developing the market in the West for two types of GM
cotton. Bt cotton was engineered with a gene from a soil bacterium,
Bacillus thuringiensis. Organic farmers use the natural form of the
bacterium as an insecticide, spraying it occasionally during times of high
pest infestation. Monsanto engineers, however, isolated and then altered
the gene that produces the Bt-toxin, and inserted it into the DNA
of the cotton plant. Now every cell of their Bt cotton produces a
toxic protein. The other variety was Roundup Ready® cotton. It contains
another bacterial gene that enables the plant to survive an
otherwise toxic dose of Monsanto's Roundup® herbicide. Since the patent on
Roundup's main active ingredient, glyphosate, was due to expire in
2000, the company was planning to sell Roundup Ready seeds that
were bundled with their Roundup herbicide, effectively extending their
brand's dominance in the herbicide market.

 

In the summer of 1997, Kirk spoke with a Monsanto scientist who was
doing some tests on Roundup Ready cotton. Using a "Western blot"
analysis, the scientist was able to identify different proteins by
their molecular weight. He told Kirk that the GM cotton not only
contained the intended protein produced by the Roundup Ready gene,
but also extra proteins that were not normally produced in the plant.
These unknown proteins had been created during the gene insertion
process.

 

Gene insertion was done using a gene gun (particle bombardment).
Kirk, who has an undergraduate degree in biochemistry, understood this to
be "a kind of barbaric and messy method of genetic engineering, where
you use a gun-like apparatus to bombard the plant tissue with genes
that are wrapped around tiny gold particles." He knew that particle
bombardment can cause unpredictable changes and mutations in the
DNA, which might result in new types of proteins.

 

The scientist dismissed these newly created proteins in the cotton
plant as unimportant background noise, but Kirk wasn't convinced.
Proteins can have allergenic or toxic properties, but no one at
Monsanto had done a safety assessment on them. "I was afraid at
that time that some of these proteins may be toxic." He was particularly
concerned that the rogue proteins "might possibly lead to mad cow
or some other prion-type diseases."

 

Kirk had just been studying mad cow disease (bovine spongiform
encephalopathy) and its human counterpart, Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease (CJD). These fatal diseases had been tracked to a class of proteins
called prions. Short for "proteinaceous infectious particles,"
prions are improperly folded proteins, which cause other healthy proteins
to also become misfolded. Over time, they cause holes in the brain,
severe dysfunction and death. Prions survive cooking and are
believed to be transmittable to humans who eat meat from infected "mad"
cows. The disease may incubate undetected for about 2 to 8 years in cows
and up to 30 years in humans.

 

When Kirk tried to share his concerns with the scientist, he
realized, " He had no idea what I was talking about; he had not even heard of
prions. " And this was at a time when Europe had a great concern
about mad cow disease and it was just before the noble prize was won by
Stanley Prusiner for his discovery of prion proteins. Kirk said
These Monsanto scientists are very knowledge about traditional
products, like chemicals, herbicides and pesticides, but they don't
understand the possible harmful outcomes of genetic engineering,
such as pathophysiology or prion proteins. So I am explaining to him
about the potential untoward effects of these foreign proteins, but he
just did not understand."

 

Endangering The Food Supply

At this time, Roundup Ready cotton varieties were just being
introduced into other regions but were still being field-tested in
California. California varieties had not yet been commercialized.
But Kirk came to find out that Monsanto was feeding the cotton plants
used in its test plots to cattle.

 

"I had great issue with this," he said. "I had worked for Abbot
Laboratories doing research, doing test plots using Bt sprays from
bacteria. We would never take a test plot and put into the food
supply, even with somewhat benign chemistries. We would always
destroy the test plot material and not let anything into the food supply.
Now we entered into a new era of genetic engineering. The standard was
not the same as with pesticides. It was much lower, even though it probably should have been much higher."

 

Kirk complained to the Ph.D. in charge of the test plot about
feeding the experimental plants to cows. He explained that unknown
proteins, including prions, might even effect humans who consume the cow's
milk and meat. The scientist replied, "Well that's what we're doing
everywhere else and that's what we're doing here." He refused to
destroy the plants.

 

Kirk got a bit frantic. He started talking to others in the
company. "I approached pretty much everyone on my team in Monsanto." He was
unable to get anyone interested. In fact, he said, "Once they
understood my perspective, I was somewhat ostracized. It seemed as
if once I started questioning things, people wanted to keep their
distance from me. I lost the cooperation with other team members.
Anything that interfered with advancing the commercialization of
this technology was going to be pushed aside."

 

He then approached California Agriculture Commissioners. "These
local Ag commissioners are traditionally responsible for test plots and
to make sure test plot designs protect people and the environment."
But Kirk got nowhere. "Once again, even at the Ag commissioner level,
they were dealing with a new technology that was beyond their
comprehension. They did not really grasp what untoward effects
might be created by the genetic engineering process itself."

 

Kirk continued to try to blow the whistle on what he thought could
be devastating to the health of consumers. "I spoke to many Ag
commissioners. I spoke to people at the University of California. I
found no one who would even get it, or even get the connection that
proteins might be pathogenic, or that there might be untoward
effects associated with these foreign proteins that we knew we were
producing. They didn't even want to talk about it really. You'd kind of see a
blank stare when speaking to them on this level. That led me to say
I am not going to be part of this company anymore. I'm not going to
be part of this disaster, from a moral perspective."

 

Kirk gave his two-week notice. In early January 1998, he finished
his last day of work in the morning and in the afternoon started his
first day at chiropractic college. He was still determined to make a
positive difference for the world, but with a radically changed
approach. While in school, he continued to research prion disease and its
possible connection with GM crops. What he read them and what is
known now about prions has not alleviated his concerns. He says, "The
protein that manifests as mad cow disease takes about five years.
 

With humans, however, that time line is anywhere from 10-30 years. We
were talking about 1997 and today is 2006. We still don't know if there
is anything going to happen to us from our being used as test subjects."

 

Update

It turns out that the damage done to DNA due to the process of
creating a genetically modified organism is far more extensive than
previously thought. GM crops routinely create unintended
proteins, alter existing protein levels or even change the components and
shape of the protein that is created by the inserted gene. Kirk's
concerns about a GM crop producing a harmful misfolded protein remain
well-founded, and have been echoed by scientists as one of the many
possible dangers that are not being evaluated by the biotech
industry's superficial safety assessments.
 

GM cotton has provided ample reports of unpredicted side-effects.
In April 2006, more than 70 Indian shepherds reported that 25% of
their herds died within 5-7 days of continuous grazing on Bt cotton
plants. Hundreds of Indian agricultural laborers reported
allergic reactions from Bt cotton. Some cotton harvesters have been
hospitalized and many laborers in cotton gin factories take
antihistamines each day before work.

 

The cotton's agronomic performance is also erratic. When Monsanto's
GM cotton varieties were first introduced in the US, tens of thousands
of acres suffered deformed roots and other unexpected problems.
Monsanto paid out millions in settlements. When Bt cotton was tested in
Indonesia, widespread pest infestation and drought damage forced
withdrawal of the crop, despite the fact that Monsanto had been
bribing at least 140 individuals for years, trying to gain
approval.  In India, inconsistent performance has resulted in
more than $80 million dollars in losses in each of two states.
 

Thousands of indebted Bt cotton farmers have committed suicide. In Vidarbha,
in north east Maharashtra, from June through August 2006, farmers
committed suicide at a rate of about one every eight hours. (The list of adverse reactions reported from other GM crops, in lab animals, livestock and humans, is considerably longer.)

 

Kirk's concern about GM crop test plots also continues to remain
valid. The industry has been consistently inept at controlling the
spread of unapproved varieties. On August 18, 2006, for example,
the USDA announced that unapproved GM long grain rice, which was last
field tested by Bayer Crop Science in 2001, had contaminated the US
rice crop (probably for the past 5 years). Japan responded by
suspending long grain rice imports and the EU will now only accept
shipments that are tested and certified GM-free. Similarly, in
March 2005, the US government admitted that an unapproved corn variety
had escaped from Syngenta's field trials four years earlier and had
contaminated US corn.

By year's end, Japan had rejected at least 14 shipments containing the illegal corn. Other field trialed crops have been mixed with commercial varieties, consumed by farmers, stolen, even given away by government agencies and universities who had
accidentally mixed seed varieties.

 

Some contamination from field trials may last for centuries. That
may be the fate of a variety of unapproved Roundup Ready grass which,
according to reports made public in August 2006, had escaped into
the wild from an Oregon test plot years earlier. Pollen had crossed
with other varieties and wind had dispersed seeds. Scientists believe
that the variety will cross pollinate with other grass varieties and may
contaminate the commercial grass seed supply 70 percent of which is
grown in Oregon.

 

Even GM crops with known poisons are being grown outdoors without
adequate safeguards for health and the environment. A corn engineered
to produce pharmaceutical medicines, for example, contaminated corn
and soybean fields in Iowa and Nebraska in 2002. On August 10,
2006, a federal judge ruled that the drug-producing GM crops grown
in Hawaii violated both the Endangered Species Act and the National
Environmental Policy Act.

 

A December 29, 2005 report by the USDA office of Inspector General,
blasted the agriculture department for its abysmal oversight of GM
field trials, particularly for the high risk drug producing crops.
And a January 2004 report by the National Research Council also
called upon the government to strengthen its oversight, but acknowledged
that there is no way to guarantee that field trialed crops will not
pollute the environment.

 

With the US government failing to prevent GM contamination, and
with state governments and agriculture commissioners unwilling to
challenge the dictates of the biotech industry, some California counties
decided to enact regulations of their own. California's diverse agriculture
is particularly vulnerable and thousands of field trials on
not-yet-approved GM crops have already taken place there. If
contamination were discovered, it could easily devastate an
industry. Four counties have enacted moratoria or bans on the planting of GM
crops, including both approved and unapproved varieties. This
follows the actions of more than 4500 jurisdictions in Europe and dozens of
nations, states and regions on all continents, which have sought to restrict planting of GM crops to protect their health, environment and agriculture.

 

Ironically, California's assembly, which has done nothing to
protect the state from possible losses due to GM crop contamination, passed
a bill on August 24, 2006 that prohibits other counties and cities
from creating GM free zones. The senate is expected to vote on the issue
by the end of their session on August 31st. It is yet another
example of how the biotech industry has been able to push their
agenda onto US consumers, without regard to health and environmental
safeguards. No doubt that their lobbyists, anxious to have this
bill pass, told legislators that GM crops are needed to stop poverty and
feed a hungry world.

 

Jeffrey Smith's forthcoming book, Genetic Roulette, documents more
than 60 health risks of GM foods in easy-to-read two-page spreads, and
demonstrates how current safety assessments are not competent to
protect consumers from the dangers. His previous book, Seeds of
Deception located at www.seedsofdeception.com  is the world's bestselling
book on the subject .

Dr. Kirk Azevedo has a chiropractic office
in Cambria, California. Press may reach him at (805) 927-1055 or at
drkirk(at)charter.net.

Spilling the Beans is a monthly column available at
www.responsibletechnology.org

Copyright Jeffrey M. Smith 2006

I Am Not The Expert Like Jeffrey M. Smith Is On The Matter

But I Truly Feel That Both RNA And DNA Can Be Affected ! ! !

So my advice is " DO NOT " be fooled into believing that genetically altered food is safe . Be prepared to see that they will promote the food so as to prove it tastes great or as tasty as the normal ( unaltered food ) . ( They want it that way to get people believing there is no difference in taste ) . But that is only to get you to lower your defenses on the subject . Taste is nothing in my opinion . Why is this ? Because " TASTE " should " NOT " be " ALLOWED " as a deciding factor in determining if certain foods are  " SAFE " for the human body .

I know that after awhile they will begin lowering the standards of these altered foods like they have done with the real ( uncloned ) meats as of this date . So don't let them fool you with false promises of how the genetically engineered foods will be so much better in the long run . If you will recall the butcher shops from the " old days " always had beautiful ( and thus healthy for you ) cuts of meat in them . You now see that the  meat industry has lowered and lowered the quality standards of meats over and over to the degraded level that they have become . Have you looked lately at the quality of meats that you see in your local grocery store coolers ?

They are disgusting to say the least . They even add a man - made " Red Pigment Coloring " to meats to hide the grey nasty ( out - dated ) piece of dung within the package . So as to falsely make it " APPEAR " to be fresh and healthy in it's appearance . When it is most certainly " NOT ."  This method saves the industry some  serious " MONEY " on not having to throw away meat that in the past would not be purchased by the keen eye of the consumer because of this simple " tell - tale " sign that the meat is possibly unsafe for them . Thus also increasing the consumers chances of getting " beyond freshness dated " meats that logically " WILL " contain bacteria's and disease that will be passed on through to them because of the sub level breakdown of the meat after a certain period of time . It's outright deceit , plain and simple !

Not to mention another " meat industry standard " they have recently forced upon us . The one where they pass the carcass of the animal through a device that kills e-coli bacteria and other pathogens with " RADIATION " that ( supposedly ) does not alter the meats actual nutritional value . " HOGWASH " if I have ever heard it !  Next they will be telling us that eating the foods grown and raised around Chernobyl are safe for us as well ? Would you like to be the guinea pig that they use to test their theory's on ?

Now the industry wants to shove these " FAKE " meats that are " NOT CREATED " by the hand of God himself into our diets . You do the math . They want us weak and unable to stand together or able to fight against them and their sick plans for their dream utopia of a " New World Order ." More honestly " The 4th Reich " !  And without a steady staple of basic nutrients going through our bodies , it's " EXACTLY " how they plan to succeed at doing just that . They do this for a " very real " reason .

Because in their minds they have already figured out well in advance , what good is their " FOE " if they do not even have the strength to stand up and make their voices heard in opposition ?  What sizable counter measure can we be to them if all they have to do is to " crack our brittle bones " with a large club to make us incapacitated right from the start ? The kind of " CLUBS " they use in controlling riots . The kind of riots they already fully expect when all their evil deeds of past start seeing the light of day .

And truth be told ... I personally believe they have already introduced these genetically altered foods into our food chain . I believe they have been on our shelves for quite some time now without our knowledge . And I also believe that the big fast foods giants have been as well . And that the real reason the food growers have begun to really " force " these new standards on us is just them covering their asses . So that way by the time anyone notices what they have done to mankind , we will all be too weak to do a damn thing about it in the least sort of way . Or more importantly that the " DAMAGE " ( to us ) will already be done . Talk about negating your enemy before he knows he is even considered to be " the enemy ." But no one has ever said that the PTB have played fair when it comes to what they have coined us to be . That being in their minds " The Useless Eaters of the World ." Remember that old adage concerning " YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT " ?  I believe it is VERY TRUE ...

Direct comments or questions about this site to: admin@radicalcorner.com